On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Aaron Turner<synfinatic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> DELETE FROM muapp.pcap_store AS x
>> USING muapp.pcap_store AS a
>> LEFT JOIN muapp.pcap_store_log b ON a.pcap_storeid =
>> b.pcap_storeid WHERE x.pcap_storeid = a.pcap_storeid AND
>> b.pcap_storeid IS NULL;
>>
>> Is that right?
>
> Woops, yes, I think that's it.
>
> (but I don't guarantee that it won't blow up your entire universe, so
> test it carefully first)
Yeah, doing that now... taking a bit longer then I expected (took
~5min on rather slow hardware- everything is on a pair of 10K RAID1
drives), but the result seems correct.
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=19229.08..29478.99 rows=106492 width=6)
Hash Cond: (x.pcap_storeid = a.pcap_storeid)
-> Seq Scan on pcap_store x (cost=0.00..5617.84 rows=212984 width=10)
-> Hash (cost=17533.93..17533.93 rows=106492 width=4)
-> Hash Left Join (cost=6371.19..17533.93 rows=106492 width=4)
Hash Cond: (a.pcap_storeid = b.pcap_storeid)
Filter: (b.pcap_storeid IS NULL)
-> Seq Scan on pcap_store a (cost=0.00..5617.84
rows=212984 width=4)
-> Hash (cost=3099.75..3099.75 rows=205475 width=4)
-> Seq Scan on pcap_store_log b
(cost=0.00..3099.75 rows=205475 width=4)
I know the costs are just relative, but I assumed
cost=19229.08..29478.99 isn't 5 minutes of effort even on crappy
hardware. Honestly, not complaining, 5 minutes is acceptable for this
query (it's a one time thing) just surprised is all.
Thanks for the help!
--
Aaron Turner
http://synfin.net/
http://tcpreplay.synfin.net/ - Pcap editing and replay tools for Unix & Windows
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
-- Benjamin Franklin
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
