Matthew Wakeling <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The gistnext total doesn't seem to correspond to the amount I get by > adding up all the individual lines in gistnest. Hmm, hadn't you determined that some other stuff was being inlined into gistnext? I'm not really sure how opannotate displays such cases, but this might be an artifact of that. > However, yes it does seem like fmgr.c accounts for a large proportion of > samples. Also, I still seem to be getting mcount, even after recompiling > without --enable-profiling. You must still have some -pg code in there someplace. Maybe you didn't recompile bioseg.so, or even psql? Remember the libc counts you are looking at are for system-wide usage of libc. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
