2009/5/25 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@xxxxxxxxx>: > 2009/5/25 Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> >> So, in 2000 databases, there's only an average of 2 relations per db >> and 102 dead rows? Cause that's all you got room for with those >> settings. >> >> Whats the last 20 or so lines of vacuum verbose as run by a superuser say? > > according to http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/runtime-config-resource.html > max_fsm_relations applies only to tables and indices, and it says "in > database", so I presume that means per database. In which case, those > settings are ok. > It would be nice, to see if vacuum actually complains about it. The docs say: "These parameters control the size of the shared free space map," Key word being shared. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
