On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I took the time to load this data into an 8.4beta2 install, and the same query runs in a much more reasonable timeframe (~3s as opposed to ~50s). I set the statistics target to 500, and got this explain [1].
David
1. http://explain.depesz.com/s/pw
David Blewett <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:As best I can tell, the selectivity numbers are about what they should
>> Thanks. Could I trouble you for one other data point --- about how many
>> rows are in each of these tables?
> Not a problem:
be --- for instance, using these stats I get a selectivity of 0.0000074
for the join clause fkr.submission_id = tr.submission_id. Over the
entire relations (646484 and 142698 rows) that's predicting a join size
of 683551, which seems to be in the right ballpark (it looks like
actually it's one join row per canvas_foreignkeyresponse row, correct?).
I took the time to load this data into an 8.4beta2 install, and the same query runs in a much more reasonable timeframe (~3s as opposed to ~50s). I set the statistics target to 500, and got this explain [1].
David
1. http://explain.depesz.com/s/pw