El Miércoles, 13 de Mayo de 2009 Tom Lane escribió:
> Chris Browne <cbbrowne@xxxxxxx> writes:
> > clist@xxxxxx (Angel Alvarez) writes:
> >> there is not so 'more optimal' thing but a simple 'better' thing.
>
> > If I wanted to be pedantic about it, I'd say that the word "nearly" is
> > missing.
>
> > That is, it would be "strictly correct" if one instead said "more
> > nearly optimal."
>
> This sort of construction is longstanding practice in English anyway.
> The most famous example I can think of offhand is in the US
> Constitution: "... in order to form a more perfect union ..."
Wooa!!
So "Tom lane for President" still applies!! :-)
Thanks all of you.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
No imprima este correo si no es necesario. El medio ambiente está en nuestras manos.
->>--------------------------------------------------
Angel J. Alvarez Miguel, Sección de Sistemas
Area de Explotación, Servicios Informáticos
Edificio Torre de Control, Campus Externo UAH
Alcalá de Henares 28806, Madrid ** ESPAÑA **
RedIRIS Jabber: angel.uah.es@xxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------[www.uah.es]-<<--
Tú lo compras, yo lo copio. Todo legal.
--
Agua para todo? No, Agua para Todos.
->>-----------------------------------------------
Clist UAH a.k.a Angel
---------------------------------[www.uah.es]-<<--
No le daría Cocacola Zero, ni a mi peor enemigo. Para eso está el gas Mostaza que es mas piadoso.
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
