* Aidan Van Dyk (aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > But, what really does preforking give us? A 2 or 3% improvement? The > forking isn't the expensive part, the per-database setup that happens is > the expensive setup... Obviously that begs the question- why not support pre-fork with specific databases associated with specific backends that do the per-database setup prior to a connection coming in? eg- I want 5 backends ready per user database (excludes template0, template1, postgres). Thoughts? Thanks, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
