Hi,
On 05/12/2009 12:46 AM, Dimitri wrote:
So, why I don't use prepare here: let's say I'm testing the worst
stress case :-) Imagine you have thousands of such kind of queries -
you cannot prepare all of them! :-) or you'll maybe prepare it once,
but as I showed previously in this thread prepare statement itself
takes 16ms, so for a single shot there is no gain! :-)
I have a hard time imaging a high throughput OLTP workload with that
many different queries ;-)
Naturally it would still be nice to be good in this not optimal workload...
Andres
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance