Hi everybody,
I'm wondering why a DELETE statement of mine does not make use of
defined indexes on the tables.
I have the following tables which are linked as such: component ->
rank -> node -> corpus;
Now I want to delete all entries in component by giving a list of
corpus ids.
The query is as such:
DELETE FROM component
USING corpus toplevel, corpus child, node, rank
WHERE toplevel.id IN (25) AND toplevel.top_level = 'y'
AND toplevel.pre <= child.pre AND toplevel.post >= child.pre
AND node.corpus_ref = child.id AND rank.node_ref = node.id AND
rank.component_ref = component.id;
The table corpus is defined as such:
Table "public.corpus"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-----------+------------------------+-----------
id | numeric(38,0) | not null
name | character varying(100) | not null
type | character varying(100) | not null
version | character varying(100) |
pre | numeric(38,0) | not null
post | numeric(38,0) | not null
top_level | boolean | not null
Indexes:
"corpus_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"corpus_post_key" UNIQUE, btree (post)
"corpus_pre_key" UNIQUE, btree (pre)
"idx_corpus__id_pre_post" btree (id, pre, post)
"idx_corpus__pre_post" btree (pre, post)
"idx_corpus__toplevel" btree (id) WHERE top_level = true
The query plan of the above statement looks like this:
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hash Join (cost=708.81..4141.14 rows=9614 width=6)
Hash Cond: (rank.component_ref = component.id)
-> Nested Loop (cost=3.20..3268.07 rows=8373 width=8)
-> Hash Join (cost=3.20..1306.99 rows=4680 width=8)
Hash Cond: (node.corpus_ref = child.id)
-> Seq Scan on node (cost=0.00..1075.63 rows=48363
width=14)
-> Hash (cost=3.16..3.16 rows=3 width=27)
-> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.16 rows=3 width=27)
Join Filter: ((toplevel.pre <= child.pre)
AND (toplevel.post >= child.pre))
-> Seq Scan on corpus toplevel
(cost=0.00..1.39 rows=1 width=54)
Filter: (top_level AND (id =
25::numeric))
-> Seq Scan on corpus child
(cost=0.00..1.31 rows=31 width=54)
-> Index Scan using fk_rank_2_struct on rank
(cost=0.00..0.39 rows=2 width=16)
Index Cond: (rank.node_ref = node.id)
-> Hash (cost=390.27..390.27 rows=25227 width=14)
-> Seq Scan on component (cost=0.00..390.27 rows=25227
width=14)
(16 rows)
Specifically, I'm wondering why the innermost scan on corpus
(toplevel) does not use the index idx_corpus__toplevel and why the
join between corpus (toplevel) and corpus (child) is not a merge join
using the index corpus_pre_key to access the child table.
FYI, corpus.pre and corpus.post encode a corpus tree (or rather a
forest) using a combined pre and post order. This scheme guarantees
that parent.post > child.post > child.pre for all edges parent ->
child in the corpus tree. I'm using the same scheme elsewhere in
SELECT statements and they work fine there.
Thanks,
Viktor
--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
