On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:56:25AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Whit Armstrong > <armstrong.whit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks, Scott. > > > > Just to clarify you said: > > > >> postgres. ?So, my pg_xlog and all OS and logging stuff goes on the > >> RAID-10 and the main store for the db goes on the RAID-10. > > > > Is that meant to be that the pg_xlog and all OS and logging stuff go > > on the RAID-1 and the real database (the > > /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main/base directory) goes on the RAID-10 > > partition? > > Yeah, and extra 0 jumped in there. Faulty keyboard I guess. :) OS > and everything but base is on the RAID-1. > > > This is very helpful. ?Thanks for your feedback. > > > > Additionally are there any clear choices w/ regard to filesystem > > types? ?Our choices would be xfs, ext3, or ext4. > > Well, there's a lot of people who use xfs and ext3. XFS is generally > rated higher than ext3 both for performance and reliability. However, > we run Centos 5 in production, and XFS isn't one of the blessed file > systems it comes with, so we're running ext3. It's worked quite well > for us. > The other optimizations are using data=writeback when mounting the ext3 filesystem for PostgreSQL and using the elevator=deadline for the disk driver. I do not know how you specify that for Ubuntu. Cheers, Ken -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
