Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Kris Jurka wrote:

Perhaps the cost estimates for the real data are so high because of this bogus row count that the fudge factor to disable mergejoin isn't enough?


Indeed, I get these cost estimates on 8.4b1 with an increased disable_cost value:

nestloop:  11171206.18
merge:     58377401.39
hash:     116763544.76

So the default disable_cost isn't enough to push it to use the hash join plan and goes back to nestloop. Since disable_cost hasn't been touched since January 2000, perhaps it's time to bump that up to match today's hardware and problem sizes? This isn't even a particularly big problem, it's joing 18M rows against 30k.

The real problem is getting reasonable stats to pass through the partition Append step, so it can make a reasonable estimate of the join output size.

Kris Jurka


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux