Re: Raid 10 chunksize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Greg Smith wrote:

Yeah - with 64K chunksize I'm seeing a result more congruent with yours (866 or so for 24 clients)

That's good to hear. If adjusting that helped so much, you might consider aligning the filesystem partitions to the chunk size too; the partition header usually screws that up on Linux. See these two references for ideas: http://www.vmware.com/resources/techresources/608 http://spiralbound.net/2008/06/09/creating-linux-partitions-for-clariion


Well I went away and did this (actually organized for for the system folks to...). Retesting showed no appreciable difference (if anything slower). Then I got to thinking:

For a partition created on a (hardware) raided device, sure - alignment is very important, however in my case we are using software (md) raid - which creates devices out of individual partitions (which are on individual SAS disks) e.g:

md3 : active raid10 sda4[0] sdd4[3] sdc4[2] sdb4[1]
    177389056 blocks 256K chunks 2 near-copies [4/4] [UUUU]

I'm thinking that alignment issues do not apply here, as md will allocate chunks starting at the beginning of wherever sda4 (etc) begins - so the absolute starting position of sda4 is irrelevant. Or am I missing something?

Thanks again

Mark


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux