On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Jignesh K. Shah wrote:
I thought about that.. Except without putting a restriction a huge queue will cause lot of time spent in manipulating the lock list every time. One more thing will be to maintain two list shared and exclusive and round robin through them for every time you access the list so manipulation is low.. But the best thing is to allow flexibility to change the algorithm since some workloads may work fine with one and others will NOT. The flexibility then allows to tinker for those already reaching the limits.
Yeah, having two separate queues is the obvious way of doing this. It would make most operations really trivial. Just wake everything in the shared queue at once, and you can throw it away wholesale and allocate a new queue. It avoids a whole lot of queue manipulation.
Matthew -- Software suppliers are trying to make their software packages more 'user-friendly'.... Their best approach, so far, has been to take all the old brochures, and stamp the words, 'user-friendly' on the cover. -- Bill Gates - Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
