"Jignesh K. Shah" <J.K.Shah@xxxxxxx> writes: > Generally when there is dead constant.. signs of classic bottleneck ;-) We > will be fixing one to get to another.. but knocking bottlenecks is the name of > the game I think Indeed. I think the bottleneck we're interested in addressing here is why you say you weren't able to saturate the 64 threads with 64 processes when they're all RAM-resident. >From what I see you still have 400+ processes? Is that right? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
