Re: postgreSQL performance 8.2.6 vs 8.3.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 20 Feb 2009, David Rees wrote:

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Battle Mage <battlemage@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The amount of tps almost doubled, which is good, but i'm worried about the
load.  For my application, a load increase is bad and I'd like to keep it
just like in 8.2.6 (a load average between 3.4 and 4.3).  What parameters
should I work with to decrease the resulting load average at the expense of
tps?

Why is it bad?  High load can mean a number of things.

The only way to reduce the load is to get the client to submit
requests slower.  I don't think you'll be successful in tuning the
database to run slower.  I think you're headed in the wrong direction.

note that on linux the loadave includes processes that are stalled waiting for I/O to complete. as a result loadave isn't the entire picture. you need to also look to see what the cpu idle time looks like.

that being said, I am generally very happy with loadave <= # cores and consider loadave <= 2x # cores to be acceptable

it's nowhere near perfect, but it seems to serve me well as a rule of thumb.

David Lang

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux