Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tomas,

Let's suppose you set a reasonable value (say 8096) instead of 2GB. That gives about 160MB. Anyway this depends - if you have a lot of slow queries caused by on-disk sorts / hash tables, use a higher value. Otherwise leave it as it is.

Probably product orders table is frequently joined which product table.
currently there was work_memory = 512 in conf file.

I changed it to work_memory = 8096

If it is all cached in memory, you may want to ensure that your
shared_buffers is a reasonalbe size so that there is less shuffling of data from the kernel to postgres and back. Generally, shared_buffers works best
between 5% and 25% of system memory.

currently shared_buffers = 15000

That's 120MB, i.e. about 6% of the memory. Might be a little bit higher, but seems reasonable.

I changed it to 20000

Given the fact that the performance issues are caused by bloated tables and / or slow I/O subsystem, moving to a similar system won't help I guess.

I have ran VACUUM FULL ANALYZE VERBOSE
and set MAX_FSM_PAGES = 150000

So there is no any bloat except pg_shdepend indexes which should not affect to query speed.

Andrus.

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux