Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you.
My 8.1.4 postgresql.conf does not contain such option. So vacuum_cost_delay is off probably.
Since doc does not recommend any value, I planned to use 2000

Will value of 30 allow other clients to work when VACUUM FULL is running ?

No, as someone already noted the VACUUM FULL is blocking anyway (and does not use this value at all).

Uncommented relevant values in postgresql.conf file are:

shared_buffers = 15000
work_mem = 512

I'd consider increasing this value a little - 0.5 MB seems too low to me (but not necessarily).

maintenance_work_mem = 131072
fsync = on
effective_cache_size= 70000

Well, your server has 2GB of RAM and usually it's recommended to set this value to about 60-70% of your RAM, so using 540MB (25%) seems quite low. Anyway this is just a hint to PostgreSQL, it does not increase memory consumption or so - it's just an estimate of how much data are cached by kernel.

Anyway, I don't expect these values have significant effect in case of the issue solved in this thread.

regards
Tomas

--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux