On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:53 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > Are you saying it's excessive you need the compound query? Cause > that's running in 91microseconds as pointed out by Alan. Of course, my bad. I read that as 91ms (<blush/>). Confusion came from the fact that pgadminIII reports the query taking 20-40ms, so I read the 0.091 as seconds not ms. -- Dimi Paun <dimi@xxxxxxxxxxx> Lattica, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
