On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 02:22:47PM +0100, Julien Theulier wrote: > QUESTION: Why the planner choose seq scan in the first case & indexes scan > in the second case? In a more general way, I observed that the planner has > difficulties to select index scans & does in almost all the cases seq scan, > when doing join queries. After investigations, it looks like when you join > table a with table b on a column x and y and you have an index on column x > only, the planner is not able to choose the index scan. You have to build > the index corresponding exactly to the join statement btw the 2 tables Short, general answer: index scans aren't always faster than sequential scans, and the planner is smart enough to know that. Googling "Why isn't postgresql using my index" provides more detailed results, but in short, if it scans an index, it has to read pages from the index, and for all the tuples it finds in the index, it has to read once again from the heap, whereas a sequential scan requires reading once from the heap. If your query will visit most of the rows of the table, pgsql will choose a sequential scan over an index scan. - Josh / eggyknap
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
