"Jim 'Decibel!' Nasby" <jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > How on earth did the seqscan suddenly take 4x longer? And why is the > subquery scan then doubling the amount of time again? Maybe the disk access is less sequential because of the need to fetch the other table too? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
