This makes sense. What queries can I run to see how close to the limit
we are? We need to determine if we should stop the process which
updates and inserts into this table until after the critical time this
afternoon when we can perform the required maintenance on this table. hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote: Andrew Sullivan wrote:On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:27:48AM -0600, Jerry Champlin wrote:Does anyone know what will cause this bahavior for autovacuum?http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/runtime-config-autovacuum.html -> autovacuum_freeze_max_age depesz We are changing the table structure tonight. These two tables are very highly updated. The goal is to use autovacuum but not have it take 10 days to run on a 13MM record table.On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 09:27:48AM -0600, Jerry Champlin wrote:Does anyone know what will cause this bahavior for autovacuum?You're probably approaching the wraparound limit in some database. If you think you can't afford the overhead when users are accessing the system, when are you vacuuming? A Thanks -Jerry |