Re: The state of PG replication in 2008/Q2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Mathias Stjernstr?m wrote:

Hi Dan!

Its true, many of the replication options that exists for PostgreSQL have not seen any updates in a while.

If you only looking for redundancy and not a performance gain you should look at PostgreSQL PITR (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html)

For Master-Slave replication i think that Slony http://www.slony.info/ is most up to date. But it does not support DDL changes.

You may wich to look at pgpool http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/ it supports Synchronous replication (wich is good for data integrity, but can be bad for performance).

These are some of the open source options. I do not have any experience with the commercial onces.

a couple of months ago there was a lot of news about a WAL based replication engine. one that was closed source, but possibly getting opened shortly, and also the decision by the core devs to add one into the base distro.

what's been happening on this front?

from my understanding the first versions of this would not support queries of the replica, but would provide for the consistancy needed for reliable failover.

David Lang


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux