Re: file system and raid performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Wong wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:56 PM, Gregory S. Youngblood <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I recently ran some tests on Ubuntu Hardy Server (Linux) comparing JFS, XFS,
and ZFS+FUSE. It was all 32-bit and on old hardware, plus I only used
bonnie++, so the numbers are really only useful for my hardware.

What parameters were used to create the XFS partition in these tests? And,
what options were used to mount the file system? Was the kernel 32-bit or
64-bit? Given what I've seen with some of the XFS options (like lazy-count),
I am wondering about the options used in these tests.

The default (no arguments specified) parameters were used to create
the XFS partitions.  Mount options specified are described in the
table.  This was a 64-bit OS.

Regards,
Mark

I think it is a good idea to match the raid stripe size and give some indication of how many disks are in the array. E.g:

For a 4 disk system with 256K stripe size I used:

$ mkfs.xfs -d su=256k,sw=2 /dev/mdx

which performed about 2-3 times quicker than the default (I did try sw=4 as well, but didn't notice any difference compared to sw=4).

regards

Mark



[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux