Re: Posible planner improvement?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at  6:30 AM, ITAGAKI Takahiro
<itagaki.takahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Albert Cervera Areny <albert@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I've got a query similar to this:
>> 
>> select * from t1, t2 where t1.id > 158507 and t1.id = t2.id;
>> 
>> That took > 84 minutes (the query was a bit longer but this is the
part that 
>> made the difference) after a little change the query took ~1
second:
>> 
>> select * from t1, t2 where t1.id > 158507 and t2.id > 158507 and
t1.id = 
>> t2.id;
> 
> I had a similar problem here:
>   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2007-02/msg00850.php
> and added a redundant inequality explicitly to make it work well.
> 
> I think it is worth trying to improve, but I'm not sure we can do it
> against user defined types. Does postgres always require transitive
law
> to all types?
 
I've recently run into this.  It would be a nice optimization,
if feasible.
 
-Kevin


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux