On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Jeffrey Baker <jwbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Service Time Percentile, millis >>> R/W TPS R-O TPS 50th 80th 90th 95th >>> RAID 182 673 18 32 42 64 >>> Fusion 971 4792 8 9 10 11 >> >> Someone asked for bonnie++ output: >> >> Block output: 495MB/s, 81% CPU >> Block input: 676MB/s, 93% CPU >> Block rewrite: 262MB/s, 59% CPU >> >> Pretty respectable. In the same ballpark as an HP MSA70 + P800 with >> 25 spindles. > > You left off the 'seeks' portion of the bonnie++ results -- this is > actually the most important portion of the test. Based on your tps > #s, I'm expecting seeks equiv of about 10 10k drives in configured in > a raid 10, or around 1000-1500. They didn't publish any prices so > it's hard to say if this is 'cost competitive'. I left it out because bonnie++ reports it as "+++++" i.e. greater than or equal to 100000 per second. -jwb
