On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 18:01 +0530, Gauri Kanekar wrote:
> Checked out the performance of Hot on 30th June :
>
> relname n_tup_ins n_tup_upd n_tup_del
> n_tup_hot_upd
> n_live_tup n_dead_tup *table1* *15509156* *2884653* *0* *2442823*
> *
> 15509158* *68046* table2 434585 718472 0 642336 434703 16723 table3
> 105546
> 252143 0 233078 105402 4922
<snip>
>
> Checked the performance of Hot on 2nd July :
>
> relname n_tup_ins n_tup_upd n_tup_del
> n_tup_hot_upd
> n_live_tup n_dead_tup *table1**15577724* *6237242* *0* *2924948*
> *
> 18460676* *131103* table2 435558 1579613 0 763397 1171497 42476
Maybe those updates were not qualified for HOT between these days?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
