On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Muhlestein <djmuhlestein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Those are good points. So you'd go ahead and add the pgpool in front (or > another redundancy approach, but then use raid1,5 or perhaps 10 on each > server? That's what I'd do. specificall RAID10 for small to medium drive sets used for transactional stuff, and RAID6 for very large reporting databases that are mostly read.
