Dean Gibson (DB Administrator) wrote:
The questions are:
1. Why in the planner scanning the entire idx_listing_entrydate, when
I'd think it should be scanning the entire
pk_listingstatus_listingstatusid ?
It's looking at the ORDER BY and sees that the query needs the 10 most
recent, so tries searching by date. That's sensible where you are going
to have a lot of matches for fklistingsourceid.
Which suggests that statistics for "fklistingsourceid" aren't high
enough, like Greg suggested. If that doesn't help, the index on
(fklistingsourceid,entrydate) that Stephen might well do so.
2. Why is "Index Scan using pk_listingstatus_listingstatusid on
listingstatus listingsta1_ (cost=0.00..0.27 rows=1 width=4) (never
executed)" ?
Because nothing comes out of the first index-scan.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
