Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Smith wrote:
I’ve seen a few performance posts on using different hardware technologies to gain improvements. Most of those comments are on raid, interface and rotation speed. One area that doesn’t seem to have been mentioned is to run your disks empty.
...
On the outside of the disk you get a lot more data per seek than on the inside. Double whammy you get it faster.

Performance can vary more than 100% between the outer and inner tracks of the disk. So running a slower disk twice as big may give you more benefit than running a small capacity 15K disk full. The slower disks are also generally more reliable and mostly much cheaper.
...
This is not very green as you need to buy more disks for the same amount of data and its liable to upset your purchasing department who won’t understand why you don’t want to fill your disks up.

So presumably the empty-disk effect could also be achieved by partitioning, say 25% of the drive for the database, and 75% empty partition.  But in fact, you could use that "low performance 75%" for rarely-used or static data, such as the output from pg_dump, that is written during non-peak times.

Pretty cool.

Craig

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux