Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There are several suppliers who offer Seagate's 2.5" 15k rpm disks, I know HP, Dell are amongst those. So I was actually refering to those, rather than to the 10k one's.

Best regards,

Arjen

david@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

On 28-1-2008 20:25 Christian Nicolaisen wrote:
So, my question is: should I go for the 2.5" disk setup or 3.5" disk setup, and does the raid setup in either case look correct?

Afaik they are about equal in speed. With the smaller ones being a bit faster in random access and the larger ones a bit faster for sequential reads/writes.

I missed the initial post in this thread, but I haven't seen any 15K rpm 2.5" drives, so if you compare 10K rpm 2.5" drives with 15K rpm 3.5" drives you will see differences (depending on your workload and controller cache)

David Lang


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux