Re: 1 or 2 servers for large DB scenario.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, David Brain wrote:

The hardware storing this DB (a software RAID6) array seems to be very IO bound for writes and this is restricting our insert performance to ~50TPS.

If you're seeing <100TPS you should consider if it's because you're limited by how fast WAL commits can make it to disk. If you really want good insert performance, there is no substitute for getting a disk controller with a good battery-backed cache to work around that. You could just put the WAL xlog directory on a RAID-1 pair of disks to accelerate that, you don't have to move the whole database to a new controller.

Also are there any settings that might boost our TPS on the existing hardware (sync=off isn't an option..

Having a good write cache lets you run almost as fast as when fsync is off.

Verson of  Postgresql is 8.2.3.

I'm hearing an echo here...8.2 versions before 8.2.4 have a bug related to statistics that can limit performance in several situations. You should consider an upgrade just to remove that as a potential contributor to your issues.

To do a quick check on whether this is impacting things, run top, press "c" to show the full process lines, and note whether the statistics collector process is taking up a significant amount of CPU time. If it is, you're definately being nailed by the bug, and you really need that upgrade.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux