fweimer@xxxxxx (Florian Weimer) writes: >> So, that web site seems to list products starting at about 32GB in a >> separate rack-mounted box with redundant everything. I'd be more >> interested in just putting the WAL on an SSD device, so 500MB or 1GB >> would be quite sufficient. Can anyone point me towards such a device? > > A dedicated RAID controller with battery-backed cache of ssuficient > size and two mirrored disks should not perform that bad, and has the > advantage of easy availability. That won't provide as "souped up" performance as "WAL on SSD," and it's from technical people wishing for things that some of those things actually emerge... It appears that the SSD market place is going pretty "nuts" right now as vendors are hawking flash-based SSD devices that are specifically targeted at replacing disk drives for laptops. I agree that there would be a considerable value for DBMS applications in having availability of a device that combines the strengths of both Flash (persistence) and DRAM (sheer volume of IOPs) to provide something better than they offered alone. I expect that the standard size for this is more likely to be 32GB than 1GB, what with modern shrinkage of physical sizing... -- let name="cbbrowne" and tld="linuxfinances.info" in String.concat "@" [name;tld];; http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/spiritual.html "When we write programs that "learn", it turns out that we do and they don't." -- Alan J. Perlis ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
