tmp wrote:
what exactly is that
"random_number" column
A random float that is initialized when the row is created and never
modified afterwards. The physical row ordering will clearly not match
the random_number ordering. However, other queries uses a row ordering
by the primary key so I don't think it would make much sense to make the
index on random_number a clustering index just in order to speed up this
single query.
and why are you desirous of ordering by it?
In order to simulate a random pick of K rows. See [1].
A trick that I used is to sample the random column once, and create a much smaller table of the first N rows, where N is the sample size you want, and use that.
If you need a different N samples each time, you can create a temporary table, put your random N rows into that, do an ANALYZE, and then join to this smaller table. The overall performance can be MUCH faster even though you're creating and populating a whole table, than the plan that Postgres comes up with. This seems wrong-headed (why shouldn't Postgres be able to be as efficient on its own?), but it works.
Craig
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
