Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Well, AFAIK the index with varchar_pattern_ops is used for LIKE queries, > whereas the other one is going to be used for = queries. So you need to > keep both indexes. Given the current definition of text equality, it'd be possible to drop ~=~ and have the standard = operator holding the place of equality in both the regular and pattern_ops opclasses. Then it'd be possible to support regular equality queries, as well as LIKE, with only the pattern_ops index. This would break any applications explicitly using ~=~, but how many of those are there? (For backwards compatibility it'd be nice if we could allow both = and ~=~ in the opclass, but the unique index on pg_amop seems to preclude that.) regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate