Heikki Linnakangas a écrit : > Stéphane Schildknecht wrote: > >> I wonder vacuum verbose would tell me if fsm parameters were not too >> badly configured, but I can't get the 4 last lines of the output... >> > > Why not? > I would like to know... Seems like vacuum does not want me to see these precious line. I really don't know why. > >> Whats's more, I wonder what we could monitor to get some explanation of >> the recent time increase, and then have a quite-sure way of configuring >> the server. >> > > sar or iostat output would be a good start, to determine if it's waiting > for I/O or what. > Ok, I'll try that. > > Increasing checkpoint_segments seems like a good idea then. You should > increase checkpoint_timeout as well, 180 is just 3 minutes. How much > concurrent activity is there in the database? 30 pg_xlog files equals > 512 MB of WAL; that's quite a lot. > I don't know exactly how far, but yes, activity is high. > Have you changed the vacuum cost delay settings from the defaults? > Not yet. -- Stéphane SCHILDKNECHT Président de PostgreSQLFr http://www.postgresqlfr.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq