On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:27 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> Csaba, please can you copy that data into fresh tables, re-ANALYZE and
> then re-post the EXPLAINs, with stats data.
Well, I can of course. I actually tried to generate some random data
with similar record count and relations between the tables (which I'm
not sure I succeeded at), without the extra columns, but it was happily
yielding the nested loop plan. So I guess I really have to copy the
whole data (several tens of GB).
But from my very limited understanding of what information is available
for the planner, I thought that the record count estimated for the join
between table_a and table_b1 on column b should be something like
(estimated record count in table_a for value "a") * (weight of "b" range
covered by table_b1 and table_a in common) / (weight of "b" range
covered by table_a)
This is if the "b" values in table_a wouldn't be correlated at all with
the content of table_b2. The reality is that they are, but the planner
has no information about that.
I have no idea how the planner works though, so this might be totally
off...
I will copy the data and send the results (not promising though that it
will be today).
Cheers,
Csaba.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
