Re: random_page_costs - are defaults of 4.0 realistic for SCSI RAID 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Jean-David Beyer" <jeandavid8@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Gregory Stark wrote (in part):
>
>> The extra spindles speed up sequential i/o too so the ratio between sequential
>> and random with prefetch would still be about 4.0. But the ratio between
>> sequential and random without prefetch would be even higher.
>> 
> I never figured out how extra spindles help sequential I-O because
> consecutive logical blocks are not necessarily written consecutively in a
> Linux or UNIX file system. They try to group a bunch (8 512-bit?) of blocks
> together, but that is about it. So even if you are reading sequentially, the
> head actuator may be seeking around anyway. 

That's somewhat true but good filesystems group a whole lot more than 8 blocks
together. You can do benchmarks with dd and compare the speed of reading from
a file with the speed of reading from the raw device. On typical consumer
drives these days you'll get 50-60MB/s raw and I would expect not a whole lot
less than that with a large ext2 file, at least if it's created all in one
chunk on a not overly-full filesystem. 

(Those assumptions is not necessarily valid for Postgres which is another
topic, but one that requires some empirical numbers before diving into.)

-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux