On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:38:01 -0700 Craig James <craig_james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I would consider PGCluster, but it seems to be a patch to Postgres > itself. I'm reluctant to introduce such a major piece of technology Yes it is. For most of the time it is not very much behind actual versions of postgresql. The project's biggest drawbacks, as I see: - horrible documentation - changing configuration without any warning/help to the "user" (as far as there are only "rc"-s, I can't really blame the developers for that... :) ) - there are only "rc" -s, no "stable" version available for current postgresql releases. I think this project needs someone speaking english very well, and having the time and will to coordinate and document all the code that is written. Otherwise the idea and the solution seems to be very good. If someone - with big luck and lot of try-fail efforts - sets up a working system, then it will be stable and working for long time. > into our entire system, when only one tiny part of it needs the > replication service. > > Thanks, > Craig Rgds, Akos -- Üdvözlettel, Gábriel Ákos -=E-Mail :akos.gabriel@xxxxxxxxxx|Web: http://www.i-logic.hu =- -=Tel/fax:+3612367353 |Mobil:+36209278894 =-
