Re: VACUUM vs auto-vacuum daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sabin Coanda wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> Using explicitly VACUUM command give me the opportunity to fine tune my 
> VACUUM scheduling parameters, after I analyze the log generated by VACUUM 
> VERBOSE.
> 
> On the other hand I'd like to use the auto-vacuum mechanism because of its 
> facilities. Unfortunately, after I made some initial estimations for 
> autovacuum_naptime, and I set the specific data into pg_autovacuum table, I 
> have not a feedback from the auto-vacuum mechanism to check that it works 
> well or not.  It would be nice to have some kind of log similar with the one 
> generated by VACUUM VERBOSE. Is the auto-vacuum mechanism able to provide 
> such a useful log ?

No, sorry, autovacuum is not currently very good regarding reporting its
activities.  It's a lot better in 8.3 but even there it doesn't report
the full VACUUM VERBOSE log.  It looks like this:

LOG:  automatic vacuum of table "alvherre.public.foo": index scans: 0
        pages: 45 removed, 0 remain
        tuples: 10000 removed, 0 remain
        system usage: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.01 sec
LOG:  automatic analyze of table "alvherre.public.foo" system usage: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux