"Craig A. James" <cjames@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bill Moran wrote: >> I have no idea if that's legally binding or not, but I've talked to a few >> associates who have some experience in law, and they all argue that email >> disclaimers probably aren't legally binding anyway -- so the result is >> undefined. > No, it's not legally binding. Agreements are only binding if both > parties agree, and someone sending you email has not consented to your > statement. To take this back to the PG problem: it's probably true that we can ignore disclaimers as far as receiving, redistributing, and archiving mail list submissions goes. On the other hand, accepting a patch is another matter. regards, tom lane
