On 3/1/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
\ >> Is the SAN being shared between the database servers and other >> servers? Maybe >> it was just random timing that gave you the poor write performance on >> the old >> server which might be also yielding occassional poor performance on >> the new >> one. >> > > The direct attached scsi discs on the old database server we getting > 45MBps not the SAN. The SAN got 62/145Mbps, which is not as bad. How many spindles you got in that SAN?
105 IIRC. Alex
