"Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > So the basic explanation is that it's in both lists due to the partial > index and only qpqual keeps the condition? I would have expected the > opposite but it doesn't change anything I suppose? It gets the right answer, yes. I'm not sure if we could safely put the condition into the recheck instead of the filter. The particular code I showed you has to go the direction it does, because a condition in the filter has to be checked even if the bitmap is not lossy. I seem to recall concluding that we had to recheck partial-index conditions even if the bitmap is not lossy, but I can't reconstruct my reasoning at the moment. regards, tom lane
