Hi, Richard, Richard Troy wrote: > The reason I spent a couple of hours looking for what I could learn on > this is that I've been absolutely beside myself on this "extremely > unfortunate" "feature." I had a badly behaving app (but didn't know which > app it was), so Linux would kill lots of things, like, oh, say, inetd. Actually, AFAICT, Linux tries to kill the process(es) that use the most memory ressources first. Without overcommitment, the OOM killer won't kick in, and as long as the hoggy applications don't actually exit when malloc fails, they will just stay around, sitting on their memory. > Good luck sshing into the box. SSH'ing into the box will even get worse without overcommitment. When the machine is stuck, the sshd that tries to spawn its child will get the out of memory signal, and you won't be able to log in. HTH, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
