toby wrote: > > That's not quite what I meant by "trust". Some drives lie about the > flush. Is that really true, or a misdiagnosed software bug? I know many _drivers_ lie about flushing - for example EXT3 on Linux before early 2005 "did not have write barrier support that issues the FLUSH CACHE (IDE) or SYNCHRONIZE CACHE (SCSI) commands even on fsync" according to the writer of the Linux SATA driver.[1] This has the same effect of having a lying disk drive to any application code (including those designed to test for lying drives), but is instead merely a software bug. Does anyone have an example of an current (on the market so I can get one) drive that lies about sync? I'd be interested in getting my hands on one to see if it's a OS-software or a drive-hw/firmware issue. [1] http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=149349&cid=12519114
