Hello, I tried the partitioning scenario but I've got into the same problem. The max function is not using the indexes on the two partitioned tables... Any other thoughts? --- Ioana Danes <ioanasoftware@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks a lot I will give it a try. > > --- Dimitri Fontaine <dim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Le mercredi 18 octobre 2006 21:51, Ioana Danes a > > écrit : > > > I am doing a test for a scenario where I have 2 > > > schemas one (public) for the operational data > and > > > another one (archive) for old, archived data. So > > > basically I want to split the data from some > huge > > > tables in two. All data before 2006 in archive > and > > all > > > data after and including 2006 in public. > > [...] > > > I got into a scenario where my plan does not > work > > > without doing code change. > > > > This sounds a lot as a ddl partitionning, you may > > want to add some checks to > > your schema and set constraint_exclusion to on in > > your postgresql.conf. > > > > Please read following documentation material : > > > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Dimitri Fontaine > > http://www.dalibo.com/ > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
