> So: has anybody a hint how I can check how much shared_memory
> is really used by PostgreSQL on Windows, to fine tune this parameter?
>
> I learned the hard way that just rising it can lead to a hard
> performance loss :)
Not really sure :) We're talking about anonymous mapped memory, and I
don't think perfmon lets you look at that.
thanks for the clarification. However,
"anonymous mapped memory" site:microsoft.com
turns out 0 (zero) results. And even splitting it up there seems to be nearly no information ... is the same thing by any chance also known by different names?
> However, there is no limit to it as there often is on Unix - you can map up to whatever the virtual RAM
> size is (2Gb/3Gb dependingo n what boot flag you use, IIRC). You can
> monitor it as a part of the total memory useage on the server, but
> there's no way to automatically show the difference between them.
So the "performance shock" with high shared memory gets obvious: memory mapped files get swapped to disk. I assume that swapping is nearly transparent for the application, leading to a nice trashing ...
I'll keep on searching...
Harald
> monitor it as a part of the total memory useage on the server, but
> there's no way to automatically show the difference between them.
So the "performance shock" with high shared memory gets obvious: memory mapped files get swapped to disk. I assume that swapping is nearly transparent for the application, leading to a nice trashing ...
I'll keep on searching...
Harald
--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
-
Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.
