Csaba Nagy <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Until that point is achieved, the above proposal is one of the simplest > to understand for the tweaking DBA, and the fastest to deploy when faced > with catastrophic plans. And I would guess it is one of the simplest to > be implemented and probably not very high maintenance either, although > this is just a guess. That guess is wrong ... but more to the point, if you think that "simple and easy to implement" should be the overriding concern for designing a new feature, see mysql. They've used that design approach for years and look what a mess they've got. This project has traditionally done things differently and I feel no need to change that mindset now. regards, tom lane
