Cedric Boudin <cedric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > So the question is: is there a correlation between not getting the wal's > archived and this "massive" load growth? Shouldn't be. Do you want to force the condition again and try to see *where* the cycles are going? "High load factor" alone is a singularly useless report. Also, how many unarchived WAL files were there? regards, tom lane
