Re: Performance problem with Sarge compared with Woody

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/12/06, Scott Marlowe <smarlowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 20:53, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> for 3 months I ran a 400M$ manufacturing company's erp off of a
> pre-beta 8.0 windows pg server converted from cobol using some hacked
> out c++ middleware.  I remember having to change how the middleware
> handled transactions when Alvaro changed them to a checkpoint
> mechanism.  I also remember being relieved when I no longer had to
> manually edit pg_config.h so nobody would notice they would notice
> they were running a beta version of postgresql had one of the
> technical people casually logged into psql.  I scraped out almost
> completely unscathed except for a nasty crash due to low stack
> allocation of the compiler on windows.
>
> the point of all this? get onto a recent version of postgresql, what
> could possbily go wrong?

You did notice I mentioned that it would only make sense if they weren't
going into production right away.  I.e. develop the app while pgdg
develops the database, and release at about the same time.

I wouldn't put 8.2 into production just yet, but if I had a launch date
of next spring, I'd certainly consider developing on it now.

right, very good advice :)   I was giving more of a "don't try this at
home" type post.  To the OP, though, I would advise that each version
of PostgreSQL is much faster (sometimes, drastically so).  Once in a
while you get a query that you have to rethink but the engine improves
with each release.

merlin


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux