Re: Xeon Woodcrest/Dempsey vs Opteron Socket F/940 with

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8-9-2006 18:18 Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:

interesting - so this is a mostly CPU-bound benchmark ?
Out of curiousity have you done any profiling on the databases under
test to see where they are spending their time ?

Yeah, it is.

We didn't do any profiling.
We had a Sun-engineer visit us to see why MySQL performed so bad on the T2000 and he has done some profiling, but that is of course just a small and specific part of our total set of benchmarks. Postgresql was mostly left out of that picture since it performed pretty well (although it may even do better with more tuning and profiling).

We are/were not interested enough in the profiling-part, since we just run the benchmark to see how fast each system is. Not really to see how fast each database is or why a database is faster on X or Y.

The latter is of course pretty interesting, but also requires quite a bit of knowledge of the internals and a bit of time to analyze the results...

Best regards,

Arjen


[Postgresql General]     [Postgresql PHP]     [PHP Users]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Yosemite]

  Powered by Linux