"Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 8/28/06, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> There's no solution short of upgrading. > That's a little too negative. There is at least one alternative, > possibly two... But both of those would probably involve work comparable to an upgrade. There is another reason for not encouraging these folk to stay on 7.1 indefinitely, which is that 7.1 still has the transaction ID wraparound problem. It *will* --- not might, WILL --- eat their data someday. Without knowing anything about their transaction rate, I can't say whether that will happen tomorrow or not for many years, but insisting on staying on 7.1 is a dangerous game. regards, tom lane
